Hello, On Wed, 8 May 2013, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > > + unlikely(!atomic_read(&cp->dest->weight)) && > > > > We should add '!iph.fragoffs &&' here. > > Do we really need that? > I don't think a SYN can be fragmented. SYNs are usually not fragmented. But we don't have the right to search for SYN in a packet without TCP header. It can be data fragment that contains 1 at this bit position, when weight=0 such packets should be forwarded as part of existing connection. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
