Hi simon, From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:51:25PM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote: >> >> >> From: Sohgo Takeuchi <sohgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> | >> > I found a bug in ldirectord and attach a patch to fix this >> > problem to this E-mail. >> > >> > The bug is that if a port is omitted in a "fallback" in a >> > virtual section, the entry is never seen in the virtual server >> > table even if all real servers are down. >> > >> > virtual=10.10.100.1:daytime >> > real=10.10.100.2:daytime gate >> > fallback=127.0.0.1 >> > >> > A debug message says like this. >> > >> > DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1) >> > Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1) >> > illegal real server address[:port] specified >> > DEBUG2: system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1) failed: >> > system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1) failed: >> > >> > >> > The problem in the source code is that when a port of "fallback" >> > is omitted, the port is derived from a port specified in a >> > "virtual" service (from a behavior of the parse_fallback >> > function), but the port is used before it is defined. >> > >> > I tested ldirectord on Ubuntu 10.04 with perl 5.10.1. >> > >> > with best regards, >> >> Does anyone have an interest in this bug? > > Sorry, I missed your previous post. > I have pushed your patch into the agents tree. Thank you very much! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
