On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:51:25PM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote: > > > From: Sohgo Takeuchi <sohgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > | > > I found a bug in ldirectord and attach a patch to fix this > > problem to this E-mail. > > > > The bug is that if a port is omitted in a "fallback" in a > > virtual section, the entry is never seen in the virtual server > > table even if all real servers are down. > > > > virtual=10.10.100.1:daytime > > real=10.10.100.2:daytime gate > > fallback=127.0.0.1 > > > > A debug message says like this. > > > > DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1) > > Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1) > > illegal real server address[:port] specified > > DEBUG2: system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1) failed: > > system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 10.10.100.1:13 -r 127.0.0.1: -g -w 1) failed: > > > > > > The problem in the source code is that when a port of "fallback" > > is omitted, the port is derived from a port specified in a > > "virtual" service (from a behavior of the parse_fallback > > function), but the port is used before it is defined. > > > > I tested ldirectord on Ubuntu 10.04 with perl 5.10.1. > > > > with best regards, > > Does anyone have an interest in this bug? Sorry, I missed your previous post. I have pushed your patch into the agents tree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
