On 05-01-10 00:24, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:57:22PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> Simon Horman wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:49:38PM +0100, Mark Bergsma wrote: >>>> On 03-12-08 01:37, David Miller wrote: >>>>> From: "Catalin(ux) M. BOIE" <catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:16:04 -0700 (MST) >>>>>> I was looking for anything that could get me past of 88.000 request per >>>>>> seconds. >>>>>> The help text told me to raise that value if I have big number of >>>>>> connections. I just needed an easy way to test. >>>>> You're just repeating what I said, you "think" it should be >>>>> changed and as a result you are wasting everyones time. >>>>> >>>>> You don't actually "know", you're just guessing using random >>>>> snippets from documentation rather than good hard evidence of >>>>> a need. >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I just found this year-old thread about a patch allowing the IPVS >>>> connection hash table size to be set at load time by a module parameter. >>>> Apparently the conclusion reached was that allowing this configuration >>>> setting to be changed would be useless, and that the poster's >>>> performance problems would likely lie elsewhere, since he had no >>>> evidence it was caused by the hash table size. >>> >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> thanks for your test results. I have added them to the patch. >>> Feel free to edit the text. >> >> Just wondering because of this comment - do you want me to apply this >> patch? > > I was fishing for an response from Mark. > I'll resubmit it properly as that doesn't seem to be forthcoming. Hi Simon/Patrick, Sorry for the late reply, and yes, this is fine. Thanks for applying the patch! -- Mark Bergsma <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Operations Engineer, Wikimedia Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
