Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:49:38PM +0100, Mark Bergsma wrote: >> On 03-12-08 01:37, David Miller wrote: >>> From: "Catalin(ux) M. BOIE" <catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:16:04 -0700 (MST) >>>> I was looking for anything that could get me past of 88.000 request per >>>> seconds. >>>> The help text told me to raise that value if I have big number of >>>> connections. I just needed an easy way to test. >>> You're just repeating what I said, you "think" it should be >>> changed and as a result you are wasting everyones time. >>> >>> You don't actually "know", you're just guessing using random >>> snippets from documentation rather than good hard evidence of >>> a need. >> Hello, >> >> I just found this year-old thread about a patch allowing the IPVS >> connection hash table size to be set at load time by a module parameter. >> Apparently the conclusion reached was that allowing this configuration >> setting to be changed would be useless, and that the poster's >> performance problems would likely lie elsewhere, since he had no >> evidence it was caused by the hash table size. > > Hi Mark, > > thanks for your test results. I have added them to the patch. > Feel free to edit the text. Just wondering because of this comment - do you want me to apply this patch? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
