Re: Does LVM have any plan/schedule to support btrfs in fsadm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 25. 06. 21 v 7:28 heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx napsal(a):
Hello Zdenek & David,

From URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs
The btrfs becomes default filesystem for desktops.

Do we have any plan to add btrfs code for scripts/fsadm.sh?

If the answer is yes. I could share a suse special patch, this patch
had been run about 4 years in suse products.


Hi

If you have some patches provided with some good usable testing (lvm2 test suite)  - it could be possibly merged.

On the other hand helping/suggesting users to use Btrfs on top of lvm2 has also its logical 'question' marks.  Since  btrfs users should probably be avoiding placing 'another' layer between real hw - when btrfs should be mostly capable handling lvm2 features in its 'very own' way. Each layer has it's own measurable costs. And yeah we do not want to be involved into btrfs related recovery cases, as we simply never understood its handling of attached disks.

Regards

Zdenek

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux