On 11/19/20 2:23 AM, David Teigland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 09:28:21AM +0800, Gang He wrote: >> I prefer to use a metadata flag for each VG or LV to skip auto-activation. >> Otherwise, it is not easy for the pacemaker cluster to manager a local >> VG(e.g. local or systemid type) in a cluster via active-passive mode. > > I created a bug for this: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899214 > Hello Dave I read the bug ticket and verified the "lvchange -k", it works. If I understand correctly, the "lvchange -k" is enough for current issue. And you previous mails wanted to have a new function/flag for unify management vg & lv, am I right? _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
