On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 02:34:40PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm guessing this simply indicates that the kernel device name associated > with the PV has changed. Is that correct? yes > Jul 28 16:50:58 hostname lvm[1424]: PVID > 6seLWa-Oz2d-jZIC-Ox17-MPaB-QGu5-uElsKN read from /dev/sdb1 last written to > /dev/sdd1. When the VG was last updated the PV was on sdd1, now it's on sdb1. > No idea what this means. Should we be using quick activation? Is it a > result of the above? > > Jul 28 16:50:58 hostname lvm[1424]: pvscan[1424] VG vg_leka not using > quick activation. The activation of the VG from pvscan is not being optimized, because of the device name change. That's not a problem, just informative. Usually, I think these messages only appear in systemctl status for the lvm2-pvscan service. Dave _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
