Re: Time needed for take a snapshot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 20-01-2020 10:22 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
So having thousands of LVs in a single VG will become probably your bottleneck.

Hi Zdenek, I was thinking more about having few LVs, but with different amount of data/mapping.

For example, is a very fragmented volume (ie: one written randomically) significantly slower to snapshot than an almost empty volume? I fully expect some small difference; however, if an empty volume take 0.2s and a fragmented one 20s, this would surely be significant.

Note that I never had such a slow snapshot, rather, even on aged and big volumes, it always take <1s. However, other experiences are welcome.

Thanks.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@xxxxxxxxxx - info@xxxxxxxxxx
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8


_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux