Re: [lvm-devel] Aborting. LV mythinpool_tmeta is now incomplete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 11. 04. 19 v 19:33 Eric Ren napsal(a):
Hi Zdenek,

Anyway - proper reproducer with full -vvvv log would be really the most
explanatory and needed to move on here.

The activation error is reproduced once more. Please see lvm2.log attached.

Please search the error message like this:

$grep -rn Aborting lvm2.log
./lvm2.log:1386:activate/dev_manager.c:2459 lvcreate  Aborting.  LV
mythinpool_tmeta is now incomplete and '--activationmode partial' was
not specified.

$grep -rn "Failed to suspend" lvm2.log
./lvm2.log:1399:metadata/lv_manip.c:7416 lvcreate  Failed to suspend
thin snapshot origin vg0/6.


Hi

Looking at provided log file - the system seems to be using some weird udev rule - which results in generating strange /dev/__ symlinks.

My assumption can be the udev rule has missed to set some variable properly
so instead of    /dev/xxxx__yyyyy  you end with  /dev/__


There are already visible some other devices like i.e.:

/dev/disk/by-id/virtio-instance-store0___O-part1 pointing to  /dev/vda1


From log is visible lvm2 wants to actually store metadata on /dev/__
so for some reason thins symlink was preffered over real mknode device.

So the fact there is missing device for _tmeta comes from the fact,
there is probably mess in /dev directory and lvm2 becuase can't cope better with this particular case.

IMHO fixing the udev rules should be enough to get things running properly.

Since the log shows tons of 'nbd' device - it could be some race in udev rule processing as well.

The selection of preferred name in lvm2 is somewhat out-of-data and now it would be probably always better to prefer real node name over any symlink at the price of less explanatory logging but with higher chance of figure out real state of system.

But ATM it's important to figure out how this situation happens.


BTW - you can always setup filter (and you really SHOULD in this case),
to whitelist devices for scanning to avoid similar issues.


I assume you want to set something like   a|/dev/vd|,  r|.*|

Also you should collect udev rules and post them here so we can check
which rule could be suspected.


Regards

Zdenek

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux