On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 06:29:31PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > I don't this way of thinking is useful. If we go in this way, then write() > should not > let you write data, and later maybe the disk controller should avoid this? > > LVM is not a low level tool like dd. It is high level tool for managing > device mapper, > and providing high level tools to create user level abstractions. We can > expect it > to prevent system administrator from doing the wrong thing. > > Maybe LVM should let you mix PVs with different logical block size, but it > should > require --force. > > David, what do you think? LVM needs to fix this, your solution sounds like the right one. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
