On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
I've done the test suggested by Stuart and it seems to contradict this.
I have pvmoved data from a 512/512 (logical/physical) disk to a newly added
512/4096 disk but I had no data corruption. Unfortunately I haven't any
native 4k disk to repeat the same test.
Use a loopback device with logical block size set to 4096 to confirm
that your test does detect corruption (using the same LV, filesystem,
data).
I believe by "physical sector", the original reporter means logical,
as he was using an encrypted block device that was virtual - there
was no "physical" sector size. It was "physical" as far as the
file system was concerned - where "physical" means "the next layer
down".
Indeed, even the rotating disk drives make the physical sector size
invisible except to performance tests. SSD drives have a "sector" size
of 128k or 256k - the erase block, and performance improves when aligned
to that.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
