Re: Performance penalty for 4k requests on thin provisioned volume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/09/2017 11:37, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Sorry my typo here - is NOT ;)


Zdenek

Hi Zdenek,
as the only variable is the LVM volume type (fat/thick vs thin), why the thin volume is slower than the thick one?

I mean: all other things being equal, what is holding back the thin volume?

Thanks.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux