Dne 14.9.2017 v 12:57 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
On 14/09/2017 11:37, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Sorry my typo here - is NOT ;)
Zdenek
Hi Zdenek,
as the only variable is the LVM volume type (fat/thick vs thin), why the thin
volume is slower than the thick one?
I mean: all other things being equal, what is holding back the thin volume?
So few more question:
What is '/dev/sdb4' ? - is it also some fast SSD ?
([thinpool_tmeta] volgr0 ewi-ao---- 16.00g 1 0 /dev/sdb4:0-4095
- just checking to be sure your metadata device is not placed on rotational
storage device)...
What is your thin-pool chunk size - is it 64K ?
- if your raise thin-pool chunk size up - is it getting any better ?
Regards
Zdenek
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
