Re: Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/05/2017 17:33, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:> Ever tested this:

mount -o errors=remount-ro,data=journal ?

Yes, I tested it - same behavior: a full thinpool does *not* immediately put the filesystem in a read-only state, even when using sync/fsync and "errorwhenfull=y".

So, it seems EXT4 remounts in read-only mode only when *metadata* updates fail.

I prefer 'remount-ro' as the FS is still at least accessible/usable in some way.

Fair enought.

Things are getting better

Can you make an example?

So again - all has its price....

True ;)

Thanks.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux