Re: Unexptected filesytem unmount with thin provision and autoextend disabled - lvmetad crashed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 18-05-2016 15:47 Gionatan Danti ha scritto:

One question: I did some test (on another machine), deliberately
killing/stopping the lvmetad service/socket. When the pool was almost
full, the following entry was logged in /var/log/messages

WARNING: Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to internal scanning.

So it appears than when lvmetad is gracefully stopped/not running,
dmeventd correctly resort to device scanning. On the other hand, in
the previous case, lvmetad was running but returned "Connection
refused". Should/could dmeventd resort to device scanning in this case
also?

...

Very probable. So, after a LVM update, is best practice to restart the
machine or at least the dmeventd/lvmetad services?

One more, somewhat related thing: when thin pool goes full, is a good
thing to remount an ext3/4 in readonly mode (error=remount-ro). But
what to do with XFS which, AFAIK, does not support a similar
readonly-on-error policy?

It is my understanding that upstream XFS has some improvements to
auto-shutdown in case of write errors. Did these improvements already
tickle to production kernels (eg: RHEL6 and 7)?

Thanks.

Sorry for the bump, I would really like to know your opinions on the above remarks.
Thanks.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux