Re: Very slow i/o after snapshotting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Well it's getting better every day (literally :)) (using git repo)
> The upstream is heavily moving towards some better automated support
> for recovery.
>
> You could download tools which are being extensively tested for recovery,
> lvm will create pool metadata spare LVs  for automated recovery
>
> So you have some choices:
> - very fast snaps - and harder recovery in case of hw fault
>
> - very slow snaps - but you could count on good old 'proven' technology.
>   (though you still could have fun with i.e. invalidated snaps)
>
> - write your own dm target to cover your needs.
>
> - using btrfs?
>


Quite fascinating. Definitely a new dimension and project seems
heading in right direction, there's no doubt. I already have had fun
(recently autoextend died on me after few extensions).

It might change the topic but I am just gonna put it out. THE Future
looks promising but that's what they said about KVM too (wink wink)!

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux