On 07/09/2013 01:51 PM, Micky wrote:
Is this supposed to be a bug report ?
Sorry for bashing the info. I was just answering the questions. LOL!
So far I've no idea about disks/tables in use, system/kernel in use, lvm
version in use....
RHEL 6.4 kernel-2.6.32-358.el6 (also tested with self compiled 3.8)
lvm2-2.02.98-9.el6.x86_64
Disk on external mega raid controller with ext4
How does it perform without snapshot? I have seen a sluggish RAID array
when run out of battery.
Is there a reason to use that big chunks?
If the origin is seeing a lot of small dispersed writes using big chunk
may multiply it manyfold (actually worst case 128-times: every 4k write
generating 512k read from origin and then written to snapshot.)
-- Marian
Running Xen hypervisor but tested without it as well
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
