On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:49:40AM -0500, Stuart D Gathman wrote: > But if they are different paths, incrementing seqno won't hurt, both > paths will see the change. And if it is a mirror that failed to start, > then the chosen leg is now distinguishable. Is there a problem with > incrementing seqno an extra time at startup when multipath is the normal > situation? If you update some PV-level indicator and only one path sees the update, then that's exactly a case where you must use neither until the sysadmin decides which was the right one to use. And the other case - multipath - well again, why didn't your multipath software start up and take control? Alasdair _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
