Perhaps when duplicates are found the seqno should be incremented so it DOES use the same one next time, and generate a warning indicating which one is out of date? -- Ray Morris support@bettercgi.com Strongbox - The next generation in site security: http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/ Throttlebox - Intelligent Bandwidth Control http://www.bettercgi.com/throttlebox/ Strongbox / Throttlebox affiliate program: http://www.bettercgi.com/affiliates/user/register.php On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:09:33 +0000 Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:40:43AM +0100, Danilo Godec wrote: > > How does LVM decide which one to use? Will it always choose the > > same one? > > You can't rely on that. > > I'm starting to wonder if we should add an lvm.conf option to stop > when it sees duplicates of equal priority instead of going ahead and > using one, and to make that the default behaviour. > > Alasdair > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ > _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
