Re: Bug! lvs shouldn't need 'root' access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 06:24:23PM -0700, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
>   Why is CAP_SYS_ADMIN needed to access a disk device when device  
> permissions
> are already present for this?

It is reading control information about the device, which is not the
same as reading the device itself.

A global CAP_SYS_ADMIN restriction is easy to implement and audit.
Anything else increases complexity and security exposure and like I
said, there's simply been hardly any demand to implement it - nor has
there been demand for proper selinux integration.

For now, configuring sudo is the closest you can get.

Alasdair

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux