On 06/18/10 13:10, Takahiro Yasui wrote: > On 06/18/10 11:52, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:50:41AM -0400, Takahiro Yasui wrote: >>> For example, there are six PVs and two VGs as below: >>> >>> VG1: PV1, PV2, PV3 >>> VG2: PV4, PV5, PV6 >>> >>> If we create a new LV or delete VG1, then metadatas on only PV1, PV2, PV3 >>> need to be updated but not for PV4, PV5, PV6. >> >> Correct - and the tools have always behaved like that! > > Did I miss something? Or can we configure lvm.conf to make lvm > commands behave like that? That's the first topic we were talking > about. As far as I use lvm commands, they don't behave as I expected. I'm sorry. My explanation was not good. Only PV1-3 are updated and PV4-6 are not. LVM command have always behaved like this. I should have added an more sentence like If we create a new LV or delete VG1, then metadatas on only PV1, PV2, PV3 need to be updated but not for PV4, PV5, PV6. So PV4-6 don't necessarily need to be accessed. Sorry for making you confused. Thanks, Taka _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
