Re: Why does every lvm command insist on touching every pv?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/18/10 11:52, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:50:41AM -0400, Takahiro Yasui wrote:
>> For example, there are six PVs and two VGs as below:
>>
>>   VG1: PV1, PV2, PV3
>>   VG2: PV4, PV5, PV6
>>
>> If we create a new LV or delete VG1, then metadatas on only PV1, PV2, PV3
>> need to be updated but not for PV4, PV5, PV6.
>  
> Correct - and the tools have always behaved like that!

Did I miss something? Or can we configure lvm.conf to make lvm
commands behave like that? That's the first topic we were talking
about. As far as I use lvm commands, they don't behave as I expected.

Thanks,
Taka

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux