Re: fsync() and LVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 15:51 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 16:53 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> 
> > The point of fsync() is for an application to know that a write has been 
> > safely committed, as for example sendmail would do before acknowledging 
> > to the sender that a message has been accepted.  The question isn't 
> > whether an application can call fsync() but rather whether it's return 
> > status is lying, making the underlying storage unsuitable for anything 
> > that needs reliability.
> 
> Right and for databases this is critical. So enlightenment here would be
> good.

Anyone?

Joshua D. Drake
 
-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux