On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:28:46AM +0700, Alexey Shinkin wrote: > And both are still "development" , not "stable" ? > What is criteria of "stability" and do you plan to release stable versions ? The labelling is like a 'release candidate' process: if no significant problems reveal themselves with a particular release after a reasonable amount of time, and I believe it is at least as 'stable' as the existing release labelled 'stable', I'll move the label forward. None of the lvm2 2.02 releases so far deserved that label - there was some problem or other with each of them. With the current release, I think we're quite close now. > And how stable are versions that included in RedHat/Fedora Core > distributions ? RHEL aims at stability and so takes bug fixes more quickly than it takes enhancements and other changes. Fedora tracks upstream development more closely. Alasdair -- agk@redhat.com _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
