State of LVM Snapshotting?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In 2.4 atleast snapshots aren't very useful to me because they require huge chunks of contiguous kernel memory for the COW bitmap table. I was wondering if 2.6 improves this situation any. currently we use a 64M PE on volumes ranging in size from 30Gb up to and over 300Gb. The smaller volumes we can usually take snapshots of, but anything up over 100Gb we've never been able to reliably take any snapshots, much less have more than one because of this limitation.

Any feedback would be welcome, if you need specifics on the versions we were using I c cna provide them. Currently starting to (try) to migrate to 2.6. Though that's proving difficult and might be impossible because of reasons discussed on LKML.

--
"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux