Re: LVM2 seems to chop performance by 33%

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 07:17:58PM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
> No-one ever replied as to why blockdev --setra / --getra is not the same 
> as that displayed in lvdisplay
> And it's not documented that I can find. There's a comment: "Not used by 
> device-mapper." And that means.....?

Any LVM read ahead setting is ignored by LVM2 i.e. not passed to the kernel.

If it's demonstrated to be useful it could still be implemented, but
the current development priorities are still correctness and new features 
rather than performance.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@redhat.com
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux