We might take you up on that suggestion, Joe. Since we're using 2.4.22, that implies we should use the patches in: http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/dm/patches/2.4-stable/2.4.22/2.4.22-dm-1/ Because we're using device-mapper 1.00.08, I'm assuming we need only apply patches 9 through 16 to our already-patched kernel, correct? I'll let the list know if this gets rid of the orphans. On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:12:30 +0000 Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Donald Murray P.Eng. wrote: > > Does anyone have any theories why our LVM2 snapshots have orphaned inodes? > > Yes, it's because the VFS lock patch isn't wired up correctly in the > version of dm that you're using - it's quiescing the wrong device. > > You could try my _unstable_ dm tree if you wish to experiment. > > people.sistina.com/~thornber/dm > > - Joe > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ ------------------------------------------ Donald Murray, P.Eng. Senior Software Engineer Pason Systems Corp. Direct: (403) 301-3473 _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
