Re: lvm2 performance data with linux-2.6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:12:35PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> markw@osdl.org wrote:
> > I've started collecting various data (including oprofile) using our
> > DBT-2 (OLTP) workload with lvm2 on linux 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 on ia32 and
> > ia64 platforms:
> > 	http://developer.osdl.org/markw/lvm2/
> > 
> > So far I've only varied the stripe width with lvm, from 8 KB to 512 KB,
> > for PostgreSQL that is using 8 KB sized blocks with ext2.  It appears
> > that a stripe width of 16 KB through 128KB on the ia64 system gives the
> > best throughput for the DBT-2 workload on a volume that should be doing
> > mostly sequential writes.
> > 
> > I'm going to run through more tests varying the block size that
> > PostgreSQL uses, but I wanted to share what I had so far in case there
> > were other suggestions or recommendations.
> > 
> Here's one thought: look at the i/o rates on individual drives using 
> each stripe size. You *might* see that one size does far fewer seeks 
> than others, which is a secondary thing to optimize after throughput IMHO.
> 
> If you don't have a tool for this I can send you the latest diorate 
> which does stuff like this, io rate perdrive or per partition, something 
> I occasionally find revealing.

Yeah, please do send me a copy.  I'd be interested to see what that might 
turn up.  I've just been using iostat -x so far.

Thanks,
Mark

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux