On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:04:47PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2003 17:40, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> > > First off I encourage you to use LVM2 rather than LVM1. An
> > > interrupted pvmove can be resumed or aborted after a crash.
>
> With lvm1 too, or only with lvm2?
i) It's is possible to deadlock pvmove under lvm1
ii) lvm1 does not have a transactional metadata format, so if you loose
power during a metadata update you can have problems.
iii) I suspect you will have to restart the complete pvmove under lvm1
if it's interrupted (Heinz ?)
Use LVM2.
- Joe
>
>
> --
> Frank Van Damme http://www.openstandaarden.be
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Je pense, donc je suis brevet?."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@sistina.com
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
