Re: Doubled PV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 13:01, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote:
> Markus,
> 
> what _exactly_ happened during the pvmove ?

Hard to reconstruct in detail, but as soon as the raid device has
'enough' failed devices, it doesn't respond to any request. It simply
isn't readable anymore.

> Would help to analyze any pvmove bug.

Don't think that's a bug in pvmove. Neigther in linux-softraid - just a
very bad accident. (If a bug at all, I would say it's an ATA bug...)

> 
> Using LVM2 tools is a good idea.
> 
> You'll have text metadata that way, would be able to hand-edit it removing
> the 10 LEs and vgcfgrestore the changed metadata back onto the PVs.

I could restore the single PV to a state, where it had no LEs on it.
(using vgcfgrestore from lvm 1). That way vgscan now finds just enough
LEs and I can activate the VG again.

Lucky me... ;-)

Thanks anyway.

Markus


_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@sistina.com
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux