Re: [linux-lvm] I'm confused

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




-- Pantaleimon <pantaleimon@home.no>

On Sunday 08 December 2002 12:25, David Corbin wrote:

[snip]

Well, About 3 gig is other partions, and it appears to me that the other
7G is lost to making the raid device and various overheads (though that
sure seems excessive).

I think hardisk manufacturers use base 10, rather than base 2, when they
speak  of "mega" and "giga", ie. mega = 1000K and not 1024K. That means
that a 120G  hardisk is only 114.4G. Hence, 109.77G + about 3G = about
113G. Hmm, still  about 1.5G missing.
They also quote the size before laying down timing tracks
and bad block mappings -- along with the bad blocks. That
accounts for another 10%.

Drives look kind of like modern lumber: you have to ignore
the nominal size in your calculations and deal with finished
size in order to plan for anything -- or just accept that
10% "shrinkage" is a normal part of life.


--
Steven Lembark                               2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing                       Chicago, IL 60647
                                           +1 800 762 1582

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@sistina.com
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux