On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:24:03AM +0200, Pierrick PONS wrote: > just a stupid question : > Why does LVM2 was not a version of lvm so that we just had to upgrade LVM ? You will be able to upgrade from LVM1. > If LVM2 is just an upgrade of LVM1, why couldn't you continue with lvm-xxxxx ? Because LVM2 is a complete rewrite, and we wanted to avoid confusion between the two products. If you look you will find that the LVM2 tools currently return a version number of 1.95.x. - Joe _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
