> On Apr 22, 2002 18:22 +0100, Joe Thornber wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 07:14:05PM +0200, Ralf Zerres wrote: > > > no, i guess not. > > > I was using e2fsadm which is serializing the steps. As far as I know ... > > > > Yes e2fsadm should have resized the filesystem itself, so that's not > > the problem. > > Unless e2fsadm doesn't work properly with "- 4,5G"... > > Out of curiosity, which resizer did e2fsadm use? resize2fs or > ext2resize? By default it would have picked resize2fs if it is > installed. > > I don't suppose you recall (or better, have saved) any of the output > >from e2fsadm, resize2fs, e2fsck, anything? > > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger Is it possible to extend the lv to the original size and run fsck on it ? Make a tarball of the available data in advance ! Good luck, Bas. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
