On Apr 22, 2002 18:22 +0100, Joe Thornber wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 07:14:05PM +0200, Ralf Zerres wrote: > > no, i guess not. > > I was using e2fsadm which is serializing the steps. As far as I know ... > > Yes e2fsadm should have resized the filesystem itself, so that's not > the problem. Unless e2fsadm doesn't work properly with "- 4,5G"... Out of curiosity, which resizer did e2fsadm use? resize2fs or ext2resize? By default it would have picked resize2fs if it is installed. I don't suppose you recall (or better, have saved) any of the output from e2fsadm, resize2fs, e2fsck, anything? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
