> The VG being locked is not _that_ terrible - after all - you only need > this to change your storage configuration (I don't expet the LVM to > actually lock access to the device). What happens with a lvextend? I guess it's perfectly possible to extend an lv while the other node(s) in the cluster are accessing it. Or are ther any problems? Problems that arise during the fs-grow operation are up to the fs anyway, right? -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdam High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008 Fax. +31 20 668 3167 "I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
