2002-02-08 01:45:50, Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com> wrote: >On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:30:50AM +0100, Anders Widman wrote: >> 2002-02-08 00:47:16, Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com> wrote: >> >> >On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 05:05:27PM -0600, Kirby C. Bohling wrote: >> >> Why is he brave, it is just a converted 2.4.15-pre5 with a change to the >> >> version number if I remember correctly that has a filesystem bug when >> >> you umount during a reboot. As long as he doesn't reboot and/or umount >> >> his data is save. :-) >> > I thought there were more changes than that. >> > 2.5.x is the development series, not the stable series. >> Not that the 2.4.x series is very stable anyway, with problems of different sorts (APIC for example).. > > And problems with the high memory VM (DAMHIK), and... > > But if the stable series isn't, how is the unstable going to be > better? > Of course they are not. But if you are having problems with one kernel and can't get around it it might be a good idea to test another kernel... Oh, by the way... have a look at http://www.linux-ide.org/ -... //Anders _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
