On Jan 05, 2002 12:12 +1000, Adrian Head wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 09:39, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > Can you repeat this test, but skip the ext3 snapshot creation part of it > > entirely (i.e. create a reiserfs snapshot and an XFS snapshot, without > > changing the kernel)? I'm wondering if XFS is getting an old inode that > > ext3 was using, but either ext3 or XFS is not clearing it, so that is why > > it is calling into ext3. Also, are you using ext3 on other filesystems in > > this computer? > > Yes there are other volumes using ext3. > /boot 20M ext3 > / 512M ext3 > /usr 512M ext3 > /var 512M ext3 > swap 768M > /tmp 128M reiserfs LVM > /cache 512M reiserfs LVM > /chroot 512M ext3 LVM > /usr/src 4096Mreiserfs LVM > /data ~30G xfs LVM > > the tests are done on /chroot for ext3, > /usr/src for resierfs & /data for xfs. > > I can skip the ext3 snapshot creation part - each test is done on its own > logical volume; however, in the dark dim past any of these could have had > other filesystems on them. > Does this sound sensible? > 1) Run tests without doing the ext3 snapshot creation, then > 2) dd the entire lv that is giving problems and try again? Hmm, no I'm not worried about old filesystems on the disk. I thought maybe you were running the tests on the same LV, and creating new filesystems on a single LV between the tests. What I'm worried about is old inodes being kept in memory between the tests. If the tests are being run on separate LVs, then that is not a possibility. I guess what is needed is a real oops report from the ext3 problem. Maybe Andrew or Stephen can figure it out. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
