On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 01:33:31PM -0500, Michael O'Rourke wrote: > To whom it may concern, > > Not that this is a show stopper, but it seems that the LVM is missing > important capabilities such as RAID 1 & 5. I see that you already > support RAID 0, but that's it. In my opinion, it makes sense to merge > the RAID support (seperate product) with the LVM product. Because the > two really complement each other. I think the two problems are completely orthogontal and complement eachother in much the same way as applications complement an OS. I question whether even RAID0 support is really necessary in LVM. RAID should be stacked below, or above LVM, not packed inside. Have fun (if at all possible), -- "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --- Thomas Jefferson "Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company." -- Mark Twain -- Eric Hopper (hopper@omnifarious.org http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper) --
Attachment:
pgp00369.pgp
Description: PGP signature
