Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove with Bad bocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove with Bad bocks
From: Joe Thornber <thornber@btconnect.com>
Date: Sun Oct 21 14:53:02 2001
In-reply-to: <7632207772.20011021193259@gmx.de>; from stonki@gmx.de on Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 07:32:59PM +0200
References: <55159047260.20011020155124@gmx.de> <20011021140746.B15468@vestdata.no> <20011021155622.A9367@btconnect.com> <7632207772.20011021193259@gmx.de>
Reply-to: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

I guess you must still have that last extent allocated.  Can you mail
me (not the list) a full pvdisplay -v output please.

- Joe

References:
- [linux-lvm] pvmove with Bad bocks
  - From: Stonki
- Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove with Bad bocks
  - From: Ragnar Kjørstad
- Re: [linux-lvm] pvmove with Bad bocks
  - From: Joe Thornber
- Re[2]: [linux-lvm] pvmove with Bad bocks
  - From: Stonki

Prev by Date: [linux-lvm] What really works?
Next by Date: Re: Re[2]: [linux-lvm] pvmove with Bad bocks
Previous by thread: Re[2]: [linux-lvm] pvmove with Bad bocks
Next by thread: Re: Re[2]: [linux-lvm] pvmove with Bad bocks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Users] [Kernel Development] [Linux Clusters] [Device Mapper] [Security] [Bugtraq] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID]

Powered by Linux