On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 01:25:47AM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote: > > > Well, our impression is that optimizing under gcc > 2.95.2 doesn't seem > > to be a good idea. > > have you pinned it down to a specific bug in gcc, or is it based on > "doesn't happen with -O0"? It appears to be a bug in just the redhat 7.1 version of gcc (2.96-85), which I'm told was not an official release of gcc. There are a couple of places where LVM has one line wrapper functions; these are being optimised incorrectly. - Joe
