On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 01:25:47AM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote:
>
> > Well, our impression is that optimizing under gcc > 2.95.2 doesn't seem
> > to be a good idea.
>
> have you pinned it down to a specific bug in gcc, or is it based on
> "doesn't happen with -O0"?
>
i rebuilt latest cvs wih mandrake compiler:
gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Mandrake Linux 8.1 2.96-0.62mdk)
using -O2 -march=athlon and it looks like vgscan is ok
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
