Nile, thanks for the info. Does LVM compiled under gcc-3.0.1 *without* optimization work? On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 11:18:26PM +0000, Nils Juergens wrote: > On Fri, 05.10.01, svetljo <galia@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> wrote: > > > > Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote: > > > > >On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 09:25:56AM +0200, svetljo wrote: > > > > > >>is gcc-3.0.1 safe, or i should also use "-o0" > > >> > > > > > >Don't have a report for this :-( > > >Please try it. > > > > > it's seems to work > > > > I tried gcc-3.0.1 with LVM on linux-2.4.10 and had a lot of problems, > but it was no problem in LVM, it works with 2.95.4. > > What i was seeing was funny stuff happening to the stack after > a function call causing (in my case) lvremove to segfault. > I have seen this with gcc-3.0.1 before, on another program. > > > Nils > > -- > > Nils Juergens | nils@muon.de | icq 7090774 < > > If we all work hard, we can turn this company < > > around 360 degrees -- gruntbert(LOTD) < > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html -- Regards, Heinz -- The LVM Guy -- *** Software bugs are stupid. Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them *** =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc. Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11 56242 Marienrachdorf Germany Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200 FAX 924446 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
