On Fri, 05.10.01, svetljo <galia@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> wrote: > > Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote: > > >On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 09:25:56AM +0200, svetljo wrote: > > > >>is gcc-3.0.1 safe, or i should also use "-o0" > >> > > > >Don't have a report for this :-( > >Please try it. > > > it's seems to work > I tried gcc-3.0.1 with LVM on linux-2.4.10 and had a lot of problems, but it was no problem in LVM, it works with 2.95.4. What i was seeing was funny stuff happening to the stack after a function call causing (in my case) lvremove to segfault. I have seen this with gcc-3.0.1 before, on another program. Nils -- > Nils Juergens | nils@muon.de | icq 7090774 < > If we all work hard, we can turn this company < > around 360 degrees -- gruntbert(LOTD) <
