Benjamin Reed wrote: > I've tried applying 1.0.1-rc2 to 2.4.9-ac9 and it appears > that something's not matching up; I was wondering if anyone > has had any luck with the 2.4.9 ac kernels? > > I get a reject in the Makefile for something that Alan's > already added to his tree, and when I build, I get: > > ---(snip!)--- > make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-ac9-eb1/drivers/md' > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-ac9-eb1/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -c -o lvm.o lvm.c > lvm.c: In function `__extend_reduce': > lvm.c:2329: warning: implicit declaration of function `min' > lvm.c:2329: parse error before `uint' > lvm.c:2343: parse error before `uint' > lvm.c:2280: warning: `end' might be used uninitialized in this function > lvm.c:2339: warning: `end' might be used uninitialized in this function > make[3]: *** [lvm.o] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-ac9-eb1/drivers/md' > make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-ac9-eb1/drivers/md' > make[1]: *** [_subdir_md] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.9-ac9-eb1/drivers' > make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2 > ---(snip!)--- > > Feel free to tell me "don't bother with -ac kernels and LVM", all > I *truly* care about from the -ac tree is ext3, but it would be nice > if it's a simple fix. > > TIA, simple enough. in line 2329, s/uint, / again on 2343, recompile, find similar errors in lvm-snap.c, again remove 1st of 3 parameters. reason: min( type, a, b ) now restored to min ( a, b) cuz #define min (a, b) is redefined to be type-safe ( new macro def insists that typeof (a) == typeof (b) ) without requireing type param
