On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 11:05:34AM -0500, John Marquart wrote: > Thanks AJ, > Me and my trusty ddd had figured out the same thing - that an > extra printf inserted into the function fixed it. It is a darn weird bug > though. > Thanks for the link - made a much nicer cleaner patch then my > own. :) Hmm...sounds like there must be a race condition in there somewhere...very odd. That's the only thing I can think of that would make the difference, since the printf could serialize the code somewhat...and it was a dual-proc machine, so... Regards, -- AJ Lewis Sistina Software Inc. Voice: 612-638-0500 1313 5th St SE, Suite 111 Fax: 612-638-0500 Minneapolis, MN 55414 E-Mail: lewis@sistina.com http://www.sistina.com Current GPG fingerprint = 60F3 160D C0D5 2C4B 751B 4FF9 6F67 E9BC 44CD DE95 -----Begin Obligatory Humorous Quote---------------------------------------- "We succeed because our competitors are idiots" - anonymous -----End Obligatory Humorous Quote------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgp00331.pgp
Description: PGP signature
