and could we leave this subject to mr Thorsten i'm sorry that i used it get your attention but i'm really desperate sorry svetljo wrote: > what do you mean that my problem is off topic > > and could you possible didn't noticed that all the post come from me > > i've got only 2 or 3 replies and i realy need help > > Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: > >> I don't understand what you mean! >> Your request is offtopic. You ask for help on a thread not related to >> you... >> But on the thread there : >> <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/2001-September/008611.html >> >>> you already got help from many! >>> >> >> What do you mean and want exactly??? >> -jec >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: svetljo [mailto:galia@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de] Sent: >>> mardi, 4. septembre 2001 17:03 >>> To: linux-lvm@sistina.com >>> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] SoftRaid and LVM >>> >>> >>> Hei why does nobody try to help me >>> >>> [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID ( and XFS ? ext2 >>> reiserfs?) >>> <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/2001-September/0 >>> >> 08611.html> >> >> i've done pretty much trys and almost nobody seems to wont to help me am >> i invisable >> >> svetljo >> >> Ray Miller wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 04:35:40PM +0200, Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> It seems that you use a fresh 2.4.9 kernel. In kernel 2.4.9, the >>>> version of LVM is 0.9.0-beta2, which is what you get with dmesg or cat >>>> >> >>>> /proc/lvm Then you installed tools from 1.0.1rc2. You must upgrade >>>> your kernel with LVM 1.0.1rc2 if you want all that to be consistent >>>> (or use beta2 tools, which is not the good way IMHO). >>>> >>>> Recompile 2.4.9 with LVM-1.0.1rc2 and you'll be OK. >>>> >>> I applied the 1.0.1-rc2 patch to a clean 2.4.9 kernel tree and was able >>> >> >>> to create a logical volume on top of s/w RAID 1 without any trouble. >>> However, a bonnie++ run on an ext2 (or ext3) filesystem on the >>> logical volume caused the system to lock up, with kswapd going >>> uninterruptible. >>> >> >>> I suspect a VM (rather than LVM) problem, as a similar lock-up occurred >>> >> >>> on another system with 2.4.8 kernel and no LVM. We've reverted to >>> kernel 2.4.7 on both systems and had no problems since. >>> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-lvm mailing list >> linux-lvm@sistina.com >> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm >> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-lvm mailing list >> linux-lvm@sistina.com >> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm >> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html >
