RE: [linux-lvm] LVM and SPL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I hate to say it - time to fork the code. We could also jump ship to

Uhm, aren't you overreacting? Sure, the GFS thing is not pleasant (I know,
I'm a GFS user) but it's a different project at all, with a VERY different
"market".

Wait for Sistina to actually _do_ somethingbefore coming
to town with guns ablaze.

> IBM's opensource EVMS. To be honest, I don't want to do either thing
> because I really like LVM, I've had very good luck with it, and I use
> it in production systems. However, changing licenses like this, while
> not on LVM, is not a good sign to me (call it a bad feeling 
> if you like).

Well, they haven't taken anything from you yet. IF they turn LVM into
proprietary stuff, THEN do fork :)

-- 
	/kinkie 



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux