Re: [PATCH hwmon] watchdog: lpc18xx_wdt_get_timeleft() can be static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 08/07/2015 10:03 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>

Wrong subsystem (should be watchdog), but still makes sense on top
of the offending patch. I'll add it to my pull request for Wim.

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

  lpc18xx_wdt.c |    2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/lpc18xx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/lpc18xx_wdt.c
index 00ff5bd..ab7b8b1 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/lpc18xx_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/lpc18xx_wdt.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int lpc18xx_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev,
  	return 0;

-unsigned int lpc18xx_wdt_get_timeleft(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev)
+static unsigned int lpc18xx_wdt_get_timeleft(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev)
  	struct lpc18xx_wdt_dev *lpc18xx_wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdt_dev);
  	unsigned int val;

lm-sensors mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux