Hi Justin,
On 08/05/2015 01:50 PM, Justin Maggard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Phil Perry <phil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/08/15 20:53, Justin Maggard wrote:
Add support for the IT8732F. This chip is pretty similar to IT8721F,
with the main difference being that the ADC LSB is 10.9 mV instead of
12 mV.
Signed-off-by: Justin Maggard <jmaggard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[ ... ]
static unsigned short force_id;
module_param(force_id, ushort, 0);
@@ -147,6 +149,7 @@ static inline void superio_exit(void)
#define IT8720F_DEVID 0x8720
#define IT8721F_DEVID 0x8721
#define IT8726F_DEVID 0x8726
+#define IT8732F_DEVID 0x8732
#define IT8728F_DEVID 0x8728
Nit-picking, but shouldn't these be kept in numerical order?
Oops... yes, I'll fix that.
I think you were just testing us :-)
Anything else for v4? :-)
Not worth a v4 just for that. The patch looks good to me otherwise.
I fixed this up and applied the patch to hwmon-next.
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
